Flowstates messaging platform logo
    Use Case

    Keep OTP verification available when a route fails

    Flowstates supplies and operates a multi-vendor OTP delivery layer. Use your existing messaging providers, Flowstates routes or both, while your application keeps one send and one verify integration.

    An accepted message is not a completed verification

    A provider can accept an OTP request even when the code is later filtered, delayed, rejected or delivered after the user has abandoned the flow.

    The outcome to protect is successful verification within the code’s lifetime — not API acceptance or a carrier delivery receipt.

    The Failure Pattern

    OTP degradation is often local, not global

    One country, operator, sender or route can fail while the provider’s headline status remains green.

    OTP performance depends on the application request, vendor path, mobile operator, sender or template rules and end-to-end latency.

    Aggregate delivery rates can hide a poor route in a commercially important market.

    A backup vendor helps only when its routes, sender registrations and retry rules have been tested.

    Failover must not create duplicate, stale or untraceable codes.

    Diagnose OTP delivery issues
    Common Failure Modes

    Why single-vendor and cold-backup designs fail

    The weak point is usually the operating model, not the number of contracts.

    A single-provider design leaves you exposed to:

    • Provider or route degradation affecting all new OTP requests
    • Limited visibility below the provider’s aggregate dashboard
    • Engineering and support teams managing the incident manually

    A second vendor is not resilience by itself

    A backup path can still fail when:

    • Sender IDs or templates are not registered on the backup route
    • Provider statuses and error codes are not normalised
    • Retry timing creates late or duplicate codes
    • No one owns the routing decision and vendor escalation

    Resilience requires a tested policy, shared observability and clear operational ownership.

    The missing piece is a control loop. Detect, reroute, verify and recover.

    Each OTP request needs to remain traceable while the delivery operation runs a continuous control loop.

    Without that loop, route degradation is often discovered through resends, failed logins and support tickets.

    How Flowstates Works

    Flowstates supplies and operates the OTP delivery layer

    Use your current messaging vendors, Flowstates routes or a combination. Your application keeps a consistent OTP integration.

    The service provides:

    • One endpoint to send a code and one endpoint to verify it
    • Configurable multi-vendor SMS cascade and approved fallback
    • A priority path for time-sensitive verification traffic
    • Attempt-level tracking together with managed routing and vendor escalation

    Your identity or risk system still decides when SMS and fallback are appropriate. Flowstates runs the delivery operation around that policy.

    See the OTP API
    Illustrative OTP failover policy
    Policy example
    Example path when a primary vendor fails or times outTimings and thresholds are configured per customer
    OTP request accepted
    Request
    Request ID createdPrimary path
    Primary attempt fails or times out
    Policy
    Configured condition is metTrigger
    Approved backup selected
    Fallback
    Request continues through the alternate pathRerouted
    Attempt result captured
    Observed
    Vendor, route, latency and outcome recordedTraceable
    Primary vendor escalated
    Escalation
    Route reviewed before restorationManaged
    Fallback attempt remains traceable

    Each attempt stays linked to the original request and verification outcome.

    Recovery
    Policy-based
    During an Incident

    What happens when a primary path degrades

    Delivery control

    • New requests move to an approved alternate path
    • Retries follow configured timeout and attempt rules
    • Each attempt remains linked to the original request

    Operational response

    • The affected route, market or operator is isolated
    • The provider is engaged and the incident is tracked
    • The primary path returns only after performance has recovered

    The goal is not to promise zero failures. It is to reduce the blast radius and recovery time while keeping every attempt auditable.

    The Operational Difference

    OTP delivery moves from provider-dependent and manually recovered to controlled, observable and operated

    Without an operated layer

    • One application integration tied to one provider path
    • Degradation discovered through user complaints and resends
    • Engineering coordinates route changes and provider support

    With Flowstates

    • One API across approved vendors and routes
    • Structured failover and request-level attempt history
    • Flowstates owns routing changes and vendor escalation

    Where this matters most

    High-volume authentication

    Signup and login flows where a small failure rate affects large numbers of users.

    Multiple countries or operators

    Customer bases where delivery performance varies significantly by market and mobile network.

    Sensitive customer actions

    Payments, payouts, account recovery and other time-critical verification flows.

    Existing support or vendor overhead

    Teams already managing resends, route incidents or multiple messaging providers.

    Resilience is measured by completed verification

    API acceptance is not the business outcome.

    Measure whether the code arrived in time and whether the user completed the verification flow.

    Then operate vendors, routes and fallback against that result.

    Review the failure modes in your current OTP flow

    Bring your main countries, providers, code lifetime, resend logic and verification data. We’ll map the single points of failure and a practical failover policy.