Flowstates messaging platform logo
    Use Case

    Messaging Cost Control & Optimisation

    Why messaging costs drift — and how to take control of them

    Most companies don't realise they have a messaging cost problem — until it becomes significant.

    Costs increase gradually:

    • New regions are added
    • New vendors are introduced
    • Fallback routes are layered in
    • Pricing changes over time

    Individually, these decisions make sense.

    Collectively, they create a system where:

    Cost is no longer fully understood or controlled.

    The Reality

    Messaging pricing isn't simple.

    The price of a single message moves on at least six different axes:

    Over time, costs don't just increase — they become harder to explain.

    • Pricing is fragmented
    • Routing decisions aren't always cost-aware
    • And there's no single view of spend
    Where It Breaks

    The issue isn't just pricing. It's the lack of operational control.

    In many environments:

    • Routing is static or rarely reviewed
    • Fallback routes are more expensive
    • Vendor performance isn't continuously evaluated
    • Commercial decisions and routing decisions are disconnected

    So even if better pricing exists — it isn't always used effectively.

    And when issues occur — traffic may be pushed to more expensive routes without visibility.

    Cost per Message — Regional Comparison
    Before
    $0.0131
    avg cost/msg
    After
    $0.0089
    avg cost/msg
    Saved
    32%
    avg reduction
    EMEA(124K msgs)
    via Vonage41%
    Before
    $0.0121
    After
    $0.0072
    APAC(89K msgs)
    via Sinch25%
    Before
    $0.0138
    After
    $0.0104
    Americas(58K msgs)
    via Twilio17%
    Before
    $0.0110
    After
    $0.0091
    Africa(13K msgs)
    via Infobip22%
    Before
    $0.0165
    After
    $0.0128
    Savings achieved through cost-aware routing — not cheaper vendors

    The trade-off most companies face

    Single vendor (CPaaS)

    Pros: simple pricing, easy to manage

    • Limited flexibility
    • Little control over routing
    • Difficult to optimise across regions

    Multi-vendor (DIY)

    Pros: better pricing, more flexibility

    • Requires ongoing management
    • Routing decisions become complex
    • Cost optimisation is not continuous
    • Visibility is limited
    A Different Approach

    Flowstates separates vendor choice from operational control.

    You can still work with multiple vendors, choose routes commercially, and adapt your strategy over time.

    But instead of managing this manually, Flowstates operates the routing layer.

    In Practice

    What that looks like in practice

    Routing becomes something that can be actively managed. Traffic can be:

    • Directed based on cost and performance
    • Adjusted over time as conditions change
    • Rebalanced across vendors where appropriate

    At the same time:

    • Spend becomes easier to understand
    • Routing decisions become visible
    • Inefficiencies can be identified and corrected

    This isn't about always choosing the cheapest route. It's about balancing cost, performance, and reliability.

    Flowstates — Cost & Routing Analytics
    Live
    Monthly spend
    $42,180
    ↓ 18% vs. last quarter
    Avg cost/msg
    $0.0089
    across all vendors
    Cost savings (MTD)
    $9,240
    via route optimisation
    Vendors active
    4
    3 regions covered
    RegionVolumePrimaryCost/msgSavingsStatus
    EMEA124,201Vonage$0.007222%optimised
    APAC89,440Sinch$0.010414%optimised
    Americas58,120Twilio$0.009111%reviewing
    Africa12,530Infobip$0.01288%optimised
    Cost optimisation applied
    EMEA SMS traffic rebalanced: 40% shifted from Vendor B ($0.012/msg) to Vendor A ($0.007/msg). Estimated monthly saving: $3,400. Delivery rate maintained at 99.7%.
    What Changes

    Instead of messaging cost being fragmented and reactive it becomes visible, controlled, and actively managed

    No longer:

    • Fragmented across vendors
    • Reactive to pricing changes
    • Difficult to explain or justify

    Instead:

    • Visible across all vendors
    • Controlled through managed routing
    • Actively optimised over time

    Your team doesn't need to continuously review vendors or adjust routing manually. The system is operated with cost in mind.

    Where this matters most

    Growing volume

    Messaging volume is increasing across regions

    Multiple vendors

    Multiple vendors are in use with varying pricing

    Regional variance

    Costs vary significantly across regions

    Tracking challenges

    Spend is becoming harder to track and justify

    Messaging costs aren't just a pricing problem.

    They're an operational problem.

    The biggest savings don't come from negotiating better rates — they come from how routing decisions are made and managed over time.

    If you want better visibility and control over messaging costs

    We can review your current setup and identify optimisation opportunities.